Gender Inequality and Women in the Workplace Gender Inequality and Women in the Workplace Women have made great strides in the workplace, but inequality persists. The issue of equal pay is still a hot-button topic. Gender Inequality Such inequality is hardly unique to the United States, however.
The concept of gender in relation to the division of labor in the workplace, and in relation to issues of power and control is an unfortunate, groundless stereotype. Suzanne Tallichet notes that the gendered division of workplace labor is rooted in flawed ideology of innate sex differences in traits and abilities, and operates through various control mechanisms.
Tallichet notes that most forms of workplace control take the form of harassment, sexual bribery, gender based jokes and comments, and profanity which passively but concisely makes gender differences an aspect of work relations.
Grant and Porter remind the researcher that the concepts of male and female are not independent relationships of the workplace, but have been strongly influenced and determined by the relationships of male and female in society at large. Unfortunately the gendered division of labor has maintained its origins in the home, while copying its Research on gender inequality in the workplace in the workplace.
This can be seen inside families through the sharp distinctions between paid work and non work, paid and unpaid productivity, and even the separation of the private and public spheres where women are perceived as attached to the private and men to the public domains.
The gender division of labor then, is not limited to the paid work force, but continues to the area of unpaid work at home. Issues surrounding power inequalities in the workforce may be explained historically in terms of the arguments of socialist feminism.
This ideology argues that since the control of material resources necessary for survival was largely outside the home historically, the location of women in the home became their source of dependence on men and their subordination to men.
This assertion implies that in any workplace, that exists not only a technical division of labor, but also a gender based social division ensuring that there is an difference in power toward men.
Boyd is able to back her claims by noting that Canadian women are employed in positions with fewer decision making jobs; women are more likely to supervise other women only; and although women have increased their presence in the workforce, this presence is mostly in the service industry only, and that this increase in presence has not converted into a presence of power.
These findings are particularly disturbing as they seem to be supported by anti matriarchal ideology of women being subordinate to men, and that men are seldom, if ever subordinate to women.
Loe notes that common methods of exercising informal power include derogatory terms of address, disciplinary actions, direct orders, threats, general avoidance of concerns, cynicism, and even humiliation.
Formal power refers to the traditional concepts of the ability to legitimately exercise control over a subordinate worker. Loe also notes the interesting addition to her theory of power in the workplace by suggesting that informal power is capable of undermining the formal power structure in the workplace.
Perhaps a strategy then for the exploited female subordinate class could be to develop an autonomous informal power structure to balance against the patriarchal dominance of their supervisors.
Another source of conflict between genders is a very specific issue of power and control, mainly the existence of sexual harassment in the workplace. This gender behavior varies in its definition due to its subjective nature, however it can generally be described as unwanted sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, creating a hostile, intimidating or offensive work environment, or more simply unwelcome verbal or physical conduct of a sexual or gender related nature.
The organizational model suggests that the structural aspects of organizations promote power inequalities between individuals and set the stage for sexual harassment; while sociocultural models reflect a feminist perspective, conceptualizing sexual harassment as an outcome of patriarchal systems that enable men to exercise sexual power to assert and maintain male dominance.Ten key findings from a new Pew Research Center survey and analysis of Census data that explores the views, values and economic realities of women and men in the workplace.
The gender gap in pay has narrowed since , but it has remained relatively stable over the past 15 years or so. In , women earned 82% of what men earned, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of median hourly earnings of both full- and part-time workers in the United States.
Gender Inequality and Women in the Workplace Women have made great strides in the workplace, but inequality persists. The issue of equal pay is still a hot-button topic. The gender wage gap in weekly earnings for full-time workers in the United States did not improve between and In , the ratio of women’s to men’s median weekly full-time earnings was percent, a decrease of percentage points since , when the ratio was percent, leaving a wage gap of percentage points, nearly the same as the percentage points in Analyzes the social causes of gender inequality.
Explores origins, economics, politics, power, sexuality, violence, ideology, and other potential causes. The gender pay gap is the gap between what men and women are paid. Most commonly, it refers to the median annual pay of all women who work full time and year .